On Cardiovascular sequelae of Long COVID: immune dysregulation inflammation as central drivers · Liu et al., Frontiers in Immunology, 2026
Long COVID's cardiovascular complications are real and rigorously documented — but they describe a smaller, sicker, partly distinct population, not the fatigue-and-PEM syndrome that fills most clinics. Conflating the two harms both.
Read the commentary →On A causal link between autoantibodies and neurological symptoms in long COVID · Sá et al., Cell, 2026
A widely covered study says antibodies cause the neurological symptoms of Long COVID. The antibody may be the easiest part of the illness to see — which is not the same as the part to blame, or the part to treat.
Read the commentary →On Long-term ocular symptoms following COVID-19 linked to immune dysregulation, dysautonomia and peripheral neuropathy · Moustardas et al., Nature Communications, 2026
A new study finally gives Long COVID patients an abnormal eye finding. That is genuinely useful — and it is the moment to be careful, because a sign of the disease is not the cause of the symptom.
Read the commentary →On The Painful Truth About Long Covid · Alan Levinovitz, WIRED, 2026
A widely shared essay argues Long COVID research has been captured by advocates who refuse to consider the mind. It is right that the body/mind wall is false — and is itself another brick in it. A commentary in four stories.
Read the commentary →On Reduced glymphatic system function is associated with cognitive impairment in ME/CFS · Thapaliya et al., Frontiers in Neuroscience, 2026
A glymphatic imaging study in ME/CFS confirms what we already knew about sleep and brain clearance — then misdirects clinicians on what to do about it.
Read the commentary →On Long COVID as a network disorder: a mechanism-anchored framework for biological stratification and therapeutic targeting · Groysman, Frontiers in Medicine, 2026
A framework paper proposes biomarker-defined stratification of Long COVID. The argument has a logical structure. The structure has a flaw — and medicine has seen it before.
Read the commentary →
Reading the research in context
Each week I come across a few high-impact articles — often the ones being referenced in the news — where patients and primary care providers need more than the headline to understand what's actually going on. Modern medical coverage is built to go viral, and that clickbait format does real harm: a single study gets framed as an open-and-shut case, when the truth usually lives deeper, in the context and history of the medical literature. These are my attempts to put a few of those studies back into that context.